What’s Wrong with this Customer Service Picture? Part I
Author: Gary BarnettOver the course of the next few weeks, I am going to share with you the tale of a dreadful customer experience and an agent who single handedly saved the day.
The sordid tale starts with the unsuspecting credit card customer who redeemed points from her credit card rewards account in order to take a weekend trip. When she came down with the flu the day before she was scheduled to leave, the customer contacted the travel division of the credit card company – they had booked her trip and she needed to cancel her hotel room.
The customer spent 20 minutes answering the agent’s questions and providing him with the information he needed to process the cancelation. The agent then asked the customer to hold while he handled her request. She agreed and held for an additional 3 minutes.
Here’s where things started to go bad. When the agent returned, he informed the customer that the company’s computer system was down. He proceeded to tell the customer that she would need to call back in two hours to process her cancellation.
Rather than putting the onus on the customer to call the company back, why didn’t the agent simply take ownership of the problem? He could have asked the customer for her preferred mode of communication, handled her request when the company’s computer system was back up and running, and then contacted the customer via the communication channel of her choice (email, phone, text message, etc.) to confirm that the transaction had been completed.
Instead, the customer called back two hours later as she was instructed. Unfortunately, there was no history documenting her previous interaction. She was therefore required to repeat the 20 minutes of information she had given the earlier agent. After the second agent confirmed the cancelation had been processed, the customer asked if he had reversed her rewards points and put them back on to her account. The agent indicated that he needed to transfer her to another department for that transaction.
The transfer took four minutes, and when the next agent received the call, the customer was required to repeat all of the information for a third time. Two points here: this interaction could have been much more pleasing to the customer if the agent proactively brought up the idea of reversing the awards; and, if this company was using unified communications, the first agent could have passed along all the pertinent information via instant messenger so that the customer didn’t have to repeat herself yet again.
There is much more to this sordid tale before we get to the agent that saved the day. But for now, I’d be interested to hear your thoughts about what more this company could have done to improve the customer’s experience leading up to this point.


(4 votes, average: 3.25 out of 5)